


| Essays on Liberty and Human Rights By Karl Hausner Human Rights Essays III PART TWO Patriotism, Nationalism, Militarism, Fanaticism, Totalitarianism and Barbarianism: A Chain of Events By Karl Hausner (Continued from Human Rights Essays II) A dangerous situation surrounds the Jewish State. When Zionism was organized, they planned to create a Jewish State from where they were expelled almost two thousand years ago. This movement started in Russia but, of course, it affected and influenced many Jewish people throughout the rest of the world. It must be remembered that the origination of Socialism is credited to Karl Marx and he was Jewish. Most of his followers, Friederich Engles, Lenin, Trotsky, etc., etc., were Jewish and thus, the Czar and his government became anti-Semitic. After the collapse of the German Empire, after World War I, the National Socialists, under Hitler, blamed all the failures and difficulties of the German and even Russian people on the Jews. This, of course, was not true, even though, some elements of truth existed. After Hitler was elected in Germany, many Jews from Germany and Austria immigrated to the West, India, and to many other parts of the world. The tension grew. In 1938, a radical Jew assassinated the Ambassador's Aide, Doctor Von Rath in Paris. It triggered the mob action of Nazi youths in Germany known as Kristasllnacht, whereby innocent Jews were tortured and mistreated, and synagogues were destroyed and even burned. This reminds me of the time, after the bombing of our embassies in East Africa in August of 1998, when President Clinton ordered the missile attack on Sudan and Afghanistan. It was irresponsible for the Nazis to do what they did before World War II, and it is equally irresponsible for Clinton to have done what he did at this time. Are there other reasons for the Nazi action? Some say this was to prove to the German people that the Jews were terrible, and some now say Clinton needed something to detract the attention from his personal, immoral situation. In 1943, during the height of World War II, there was an armed Jewish ghetto uprising in Warsaw. Certainly it was organized and subsidized by the Western Allies and it was a foolish deed. This forced the German Army to bomb the ghetto and even more so, gave the Nazis the excuse to arrest all of the remaining Jews within their jusisdiction and throw them into concentration camps. Yes, this was all in the name of freedom, patriotism and justice. In Bohemia and Moravia, the Protectorate, the Czech people were well off during World War II. They did not have to join the Army, they worked in factories, were well paid and had a fairly good lifestyle. The Allies initiated the assassination of the Governor Heydrich, in order to create an upheaval among the Czech people. The Nazis, as revenge, similar to Clinton's order, bombed the Czech village, Lidice. Hundreds of innocent Czech people were killed, so hatred created new hatred in the interest of what? Patriotism, freedom? And the result was barbarianism. During World War II and shortly thereafter, a number of Jewish, radical terrorist organizatons operated within Palestine, of which Menachim Begin was a most prominent member. He had British installations in the Israel. Later he became President of Israel. Now, of course, we call the others terrorists. They are terrorists and criminals. When we supported them to perform the same or similar acts, we called them freedom fighters. Isn't it pitiful for young Israelis to wear the uniform and machine pistols for years and be in the reserves. They don'f know, whenever they drive by car or by bus, a bomb might explode. Israelis have not learned to establish relations with their hostile neighbors. without question, the Arab world is extremely hostile to Israel, but isn't Israel fueling that hostility? Erecting buildings in Arab settlements is a provocation. It is the same provocation, or even more so, when, between World War I and World War II the Czech government built Czech schools in all German or Hungarian regions within the CSR. This is provocation, this is hatred, and hatred even generates more hatred. It is certainly not what the New Testament teaches. It is not Christianity in action. It is radical nationalism. Another activity which produces hatred is the Holocaust Museums. They may achieve their goal within a certain period of time, but will not establish the desired understanding and respect for the suffering people. These Holocaust Museums would be educational, if they were set up objectively as concentration camp museums. They would have to include the Nazi concentration camps, the concentration camps of the Soviets, the forced labor camps in china and those camps operated after World War II and even now in many parts of the world. They should include the situations Native Americans were subjected to and then perhaps future generations could learn from it. But the way it is now, it only divides more and more of the world. Another example is Auschwitz, where in 1945-46 at the Nuremberg Trial, the Soviets "provided evidence" that four and one-half million Jews were gassed to death. Now, Jewish organizations claim that the number is more like 1.2 million. However, Auschwitz was not just a jewish camp, there were many other nationalities in it. During 1998, in protest to this claim, Polish Catholcs have erected small crosses at the Auschwitz campsite in memory of those Catholic Poles who died there. This brought a massive protest by Jewish groups and finally the Cardinal of Warsaw caved in, most likely from the pressure from the Vatican, and stopped the erection of new crosses. The Jews want it to be a Jewish memorial and, of course, the Polish people also want to have their share of it. Who is going to benefit from this? Now, turning to the present new era of terrorism and the future of Israel. Israel is a very small country, a small nation, srrounded by hostile neighbors. However, after fifty years, if good will would have prevailed, a workable relationship could have been established as was, for example, between France and Germany. No real love, but at least no hostility. The Israelis accuse the Arabs of terrorism and the Arabs say, "Well, your state was founded by terror, your first President was a terrorist". Israel must find a way to live with its neighbors. The United States must give up using force everywhere they please. We must return our troops home, protect our borders and tell our industry to produce more consumer goods and fewer guns, tanks, airplanes and missles. We import billions of dollars worth of consumer products from Asia for consumption in the United States and we export billions of dollars worth of weaponry to other countries. Is this what our Founding Fathers were fighting for? I doubt it very much. We are told by our government that this country has the greatest prosperity ever. A classic Clinton lie. The fact is that we have well over five and one-half trillion dollalrs in federal debt well over a trillion dollars in consumer debt, and most new construction is financed with bonds. We have an ever-growing trade deficit and we are continuously living off our resources with borrowed money. More and more American families are in such situations that the wife has to work. She cannot care for the family because of high taxes, high interest, and all of the other things and, of course, because of the ever-confusing lifestyle. More than one million homes nation wide are in foreclosure because of greedy lenders, real estate developers, and some criminalistic lawyers and real estate agents in their profiteering pursuits. The gas prices nation wide have run amuck, and the media, the government, the bureaucrats, have yet to tell the American public the truth about a faltering economy. In fact, some media so-called professionals have even gone as far as to blame the American citizens for a government that is badly in dis-repair. We have been abused, cursed at, called un-patriotic, and worst, if we dare to complain, while our Congress does absolutely nothing to protect their constituents and our nation. This, indeed, is a traversity of fairness and justice, perpetrated by people in high places that haven't got a clue what is going on. It is easy to access blame and even easier to lie about their inability to lead. But for once, why don't they own up to their people, and for once tell the truth... We have well over two million people in prisons and if all who are sentenced would have to stay in prison, we would have twice as many there. If all criminals were caught5, convicted and sentenced, we would have to double and triple our prisons. We have come to a situation where over fifty percent of the Amercian people accept immorality, extramartal and premarital sex or forms of sexual and moral abuse, drug addiction, increasing alcoholism among the young, and children at the ages of eight and ten committing crimes and indulging in under-age sex orgies. We have lost respect for ourselves, for our family and those of us who are struggling are really struggling. More and more federal agents are telling us how to manufacture things, how to farm and everything the opposite of what our Founding Fathers had envisioned. Yes, patriotism, if not very, very objectively scrutinized, will lead to nationalism and nationalism is already a dangerous situation. Nationalism and socialism are very close and then comes the power of government, totalitarianism and barbarianism, either by government or by radical groups who ordain themselves in the name of freedom and justice. We see it in Northern Ireland, we see it in Kosovo and we see some of it between the black communities and other ethnic communities in our cities and in many other fields. Yes, we are still one of the best countries to live in, but will the Twenty-first Century be the Century that we could lose what our Founding Fathers had envisioned for us, and what Jesus Christ proclaimed in the New Testament. References: 1. The Declaration of Independence. 2. The United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. 3. Sheldon Richmond, "Separating School and State", Future Freedom Foundation, Fairfax, Virginia. 4. Ernst Paul, "Es gibt nicht nur ein Lidice" (There is not only one Lidice) Sudetendeutchen Rat e. V., Muenchen. 5. "The Sudeten Question", Sudeten German Council, Muenchen. 6. Friedrich Prinz, "Ein Mythos Zerbricht: Benes" (A Myth Cracks: Benes) Sudetendeutschen ung, Muenchen. 7. Dr. Wilhelm K. Turnwald, "Documents of the Expulsion of the Sudeten Germans", University Press, Munich. 8. Arthur Ponsonby, Member of Parliament, "Falsehood in Wartime - Propaganda and Lies of the First World War", 1928, George Allen and Unwin. 9. "The Failure of American Foreign Wars", Future Freedom Foundation, Fairfax, VA. 10. Ralph Raico, "Nazifying the Germans", January, 1997 paper. 11. George Morgenstern, "Pearl Harbor - The Story of the Secret War", 1947, Bevin-Adair Co. 12. Theodore N. Kaufman, "Germany Must Perish", 1939, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey. 13. Ralph Franklin Keeling, "Gruesome Harvest - The Allies' Postwar War Against the German People", 1947, The Institute of American Economics, Chicago. 14. "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace", 1953, The Caxton Printers, Ltd Caldwell, Idaho, 15. David Irving, "Apocalypse 1945 - The Destruction of Dresden", 1995, Veritas Publishing Co. Pty. Ltd. 16. Arthur R. Butz, "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century", 1976, England, Library of Congress call number D 804.34.B88. 17. David Irving, "Nuremberg - The Last Battle", 1996, Focal Point Publications, London. 18. Joseph Halow, "Innocent at Dachau", 1993, The Noontide Press. 19. Rabbi Daniel Lapin, "Interview with Dr. Dobson", Focus on the Family, Colorado Springs, Colorado (Audiotape). 20. David Cole, "Interview with Dr. Franciszek Piper", Director, Auschwitz State Museum. (Video), Institute for Historical Review, Newport Beach, California. 21. Karl Hausner, "1945 in Memory", The Great Expulsions of 1946", "Hitler's Cross", "Let Bygones Be Bygones", "Concentration Camps, Myths and Realities", "The Silent Majority". 22. Dr. Erwin Lutzer, "Hitler's Cross", Moody Press, 1995, Chicago. "Change of opinion is often only the progress of sound thought and growing kowledge; and though sometimes regarded as inconsistency, it is by the nobel inconsistency natural to a mind ever ready for growth and expansion of thought, and that never fears to follow where truth and duty may lead the way." By Tyron Edwards ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Was Masaryk The Mastermind of Wilson's Fourteen Points, Maneuvering The United States Into World War I? The Profile of a Humanist, Philosopher, Revolutionary, Traitor, Statesman, or Opportunist!!! By Karl Hausner INTRODUCTION In this review, we will ask many questions and have some answers. Ho did a person of poor parents attain the success of becoming a professor of philosophy and later president of a nation? In addition, how could a person, who was brought up speaking the German language and enjoying German culture, a man who obtained all his education in German, become a nationalistic Czech and the first president of Czechoslovakia? We shall also ask how Masaryk could get access to the American political and financial elite. We will ask whether he influenced President Wilson, as Wilson contemplated entering World War I, or whether Wilson and his political and industrial elite used Masaryk as an instrument to destroy the two largest monarchies in Europe, Austria/Hungary and Germany. Thomas Garrigue Masaryk March 7, 1850 - September 14, 1937 In 2000, the Czech Republic celebrated the birth of Thomas G. Masaryk, its first president. In 1948, when the Communists took over the country under Klement Gottwald, he was brought into discredit. His monuments were removed because Masaryk was not a Marxist. However, in the year 2000, a new statue to him was erected in Prague. During the dedication, the American Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, who was born in Prague, was the guest of honor. A great deal is known about Masaryk, though much more is kept secret. Both the Encyclopedia Britannica and the German Brockhaus say very little about his ancestry, upbringing, his frequent changes of religion, political outlook, jobs and his activity in the United States. Who actually was this man who is claimed to be a great humanist, philosopher and statesman? Most know that between 1918 and 1935 he was the first president of Czechoslovakia, when his long time associate, Eduard Benes, succeeded him. Masaryk died as a very wealthy person in the prominent castle LANY in Bohemia. During the celebrations in Prague and, of course, during the entire era of post-war Czechoslovakia, the truth about Czech politicians active during World War I and II, was distorted and this continues to be the case even today. Although the Czech Republic is now part of NATO and wants to join the European Union, the truth and even justic are far from being implemented. Yet, it was Masaryk who claimed that truth alone was the foundation of his newly created country. The average Czech, and for that matter most Americans, know that Prague was the capital of Czechoslovakia and now the Czech Republic. Very few know that this city was really not a Czech, but a Bohemian city. Seven hundred years ago it was even the capital of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation under Emperor Karl IV, a Frankonian. Czech Nationalism and Communism have kept such information away from the Czech people and the world. For example, the fact that the oldest German University, the Karl's University, was founded in Prague 700 years ago. Up to the beginning of World War I, most cities in the present Czech Republic were heavily populated by German people, and in many instances they were the majority. All these cities except Tabor was founded not by the Czechs but by the Germans. These two nations were living together for almost 1500 years, generally in harmony. The exceptions were the Hussite Wars, the time of the first Czechoslovak Republic between 1919 and 1938 and, of course, after World War II, when practically all Sudeten Germans - 3.5 Million of the them - were brutally expelled from their homeland. More than 240 thousand Sudeten Germans were killed during the process. Masaryk, The Person: His mother was the daughter of a German innkeeper in the old German Town of Auspitz, Moravia. She went to Vienna for a short time and then became the cook for a very wealthy family - the Redlichs - a Jewish family whose language was German. His legal father was an illiterate Hungarian Slovak by the name of Joseph Masaryk. It was generally accepted, that his biological father was Mr.Nathan Redlich. It was rather common, not just in wealthy Jewish families, that young women, who kept the household, also served as mistresses or concubines. After she was pregnant for a few months, she married the much younger illiterate coachman at the Redlich estate, to establish a legitimate family. They married on August 15, 1849; however, Thomas was born on March 7, 1850. It was a little kept secret that the biological father was Nathan Redlich, who from his own marriage had three sons, all of whom became well to do. Since Masaryk's mother was German and the Redlich family spoke German, Thomas grew up with the German language. He, in his later years, spoke very highly of his mother, who gave him everything, but he rarely mentioned his legal father or his half brothers. Nathan Redlich was generous to Thomas Masaryk and it is well known, that his attorney, Dr. Alois Prazak, of Bruenn (Brno) paid frequent amounts to the Masaryk family for the education of Thomas. As late as 1879, Masaryk's colleague Penicek had to translate his positions into Czech. He spoke Czech with a strong German accent until his death. Yet, he became a fanatical Czech nationalist, hating the Habsburgs and perhaps due to that, everything German, especially the Catholic Church. Later, whe n Masaryk created Czechoslovakia, many Sudeten Germans hoped and believed he would be friendly to them because of his heritage. It is true, that Masaryhk recognized that the Bohemian Germans or the Sudeten Germans were economically and culturally more advanced than the Czechs. His American Connections: While Masaryk was studying in Leipzig, he met a wealthy American music student, Charlotte Garrigue and married her. Through this connection, he was exposed to the American financial, industrial and political elite, especially to the extremely wealthy and influential industrialist, Charles Crane who engaged Thomas as a consultant. It was through Crane, that Masaryk got to know Woodrow Wilson. Crane financed Wilson's election and Masaryk's son Jan was an intern at the Crane industrial empire and later in the secretary of state's office under Wilson. Jan even married Crane's daughter. Although the United States had intensively engaged in the "melting pot" ideology, eliminating the ethnic grouping in this country, Wilson came up with the Fourteen Points of self-determination for Europe. In the Habsburg Empire, fourteen nationalities, including Czechs and Slovaks, harmonized relatively well, but Masaryk, as an extreme nationalist, wanted the opposite. His self-determining ideology appealed to many different Slavic American ethnic groups and the Wilson administration. Thus, the United States entered the conflict, proposing a self-determination concept for Austria - Ottoman Empire - the enemy states. In other words Wilson's Fourteen Points, which big business considered good business. Without the American involvement in World War I, the nations involved in this conflict would have to agree to a less dramatic change. Hitler would have not won power later, and World War II could have been avoided, as serious historians point out. Most likely, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia would have not succeeded and Palestine would have remained under Turkish rule. Historic Review of Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic: Much has already been written about Thomas Garrigue Masaryk. After a dispute, stretching over several years to find a suitable location for a new Masaryk monument, the American Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, finally unvailed his new statue at his 150th birthday at the Hradschin Plaza in Prague. Who actually was this man, portrayed as a great humanist, philosopher and politician? The world knows that he was the First President of the 1918/19 newly founded, multinational State of Czechoslovakia, created at the expense of the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy and the various ethnic groups, especially the 3.5 million Sudeten Germans and the close to one million Magyrs. On the presidential banner he had embroidered in Czech on one side, in Latin on the other, his motto: "The Truth is Victorious!" The entire history of Bohemia, Moravia and Sudeten-Silesia (in the following only Bohemia), for centuries settled by Germans and Czechs, some Jews, who were mostly German speaking, was woven by the Czechs in mysticism and poetry, purposive fairy tales and stories, beginning with forefathers, Czech and Libusche. In this version, Karl IV is only spoken of as the King of the Czechs (incorrectly), crowned in Zaachy. The fact that he was the Emperor of the Roman Empire of the German Nation, and Zaachy, mentioned as the old imperial city Aix-la-Chapelle, is conveniently withheld. The Czech Hussites, who ravaged innumerable, mostly German villages, towns and monasteries, murdering thousands of people, warded off five crusades to the Holy Land, until they destroyed themselves in 1434 at Lipany. With that, the reign of terror of over 15 years, ended. From 1620 until 1920, the Czechs allegedly had to endure 300 years of darkness, although during the same time, Bohemia became the economically highest developed province of the monarchy and perhaps Europe. It should be stated, that Bohemia is incorrectly translated as Chesky by Czech nationalists. Bohemia = Czech is wrong, but is maintained to this day. The assertion, that formerly many Czechs only spoke German is untrue! Further contortions and portrayals could be added. Similarly, Masaryk was given a halo until 1948. When the Communists took over, he was considered a traitor by the Czech Communists. So it was and is history being bent accordingly. Masaryk's Autobiography: He wrote of himself that he was a Slovak, later a Moravian, finally a Czech. Was he not rather of German nationality and Austrian citizenship. He declared his mother Theresia to be a German from Auspitz (Hustopece). She was the daughter of a German innkeeper and butcher, who later was the Mayor of Auspitz. After several years in Vienna, she came to Goeding in 1849 to a well-to-do-Jewish family by the name of Redlichs to be their personal chef. She only spoke German, as the Redlich family also conversed in German. On August 15, 1849, she married the Hungarian Slovak by the name of Josef Masaryk who worked for the Redlichs as coachman. He could not read nor write and was a full 10 years younger than Theresia, When Thomas was born on March 7, 1850, it was an open secret in the Redlich family, that Nathan Redlich was the biological father. He already had three sons with his wife: Alois, Ignaz and Adolf. All three of them became very successful. The son of Adolf, Josef Redlich, was for many years Secretary of the Treasury in Vienna. When Masaryk became President, he offered him the position of Minister of Trade - respectively of Finance in Czechoslovakia. It is known, that the lawyer of the Redlich family, who later became the Minister in Bruenn, Dr. Alois Prazak, paid significant subsidies to the mother of Masaryk for his education. Masaryk himself and the Redlich family were good friends all their lives, especially with Josef Redlich and his wife Alice. A Redlich was also mayor of Goeding. Masaryk hardly mentioned either his father, Josef Masaryk, or his brother Martin and Ludwig, always emphasizing his mother, to whom he felt he was indebted for everything, even though, she was German and he was a "Czech". He pursued his study in Auspitz, Bruenn, Vienna and Leipzig, studying exclusively in the German language. It is understandable that many German-Bohemians saw in Masaryk a person to be trusted. He in turn felt a certain respect for the Germans, especially because of their economic achievement and culture. When he stood for the truth about the Koeniginhofer and Gruenberger manuscripts (Czech language writings, centuries before), which was unmasked to have been forged, Czech hostility almost caused him to emigrate to the U.S.A. His lectures at the Czech University were in the Czech language, even though, he had a strong accent. The life of Masaryk was rich in dramatic events, which apparently shaped his work and his personality. One of those, for example, was his defense of the Jew, Leopold Hilson, from Kuttenberg, falsely accused of ritual murder and sentenced to death, whom he was able to save before the man was executed. This was widely discussed in American Jewish circles. Therefore, in 1907, Justice Louis D. Brandeis of the U.S. Supreme Court, a good friend of Woodrow Wilson, organized a "large reception" for Masaryk with the Jewish community in New York. Large financial donations were collected for him. Many other financial contributions were made to him and in 1918 he received for the not yet existing Czechoslovakia, a loan of $10,000,000 from Wall Street. Masaryk noted: "Especially in America, the Leopold Hilson case proved to be a great success." Politically, Masaryk made a name for himself through his writings, among others The Czech Question and Russia and Europe. He further became known through his intervention in the Agram (Zagreb) trial of 1909 against Serbian rioters, insofar as he proved the documentary evidence to be falsified. A stroke of luck for him was his marriage to Charlotte Garrigue on the 15th of March in 1878 in New York. The father of Charlotte (whose parents had emigrated to Denmark via Germany as French Hugenotts) was at the time in training with the publisher Brockhaus in Leipzig, from where he emigrated to America. He became wealthy and in the end owned the largest fire insurance company in the U.S.A. The family had eleven children, eight daughters and three sons. In 1870 he visited Leipzig with part of his family. Charlotte remained there for three years, studying music. In June of 1876, Charlotte returned for another visit. At that time, Masaryk resided with the Goering family, and so luck took its course. After the wedding, the newly-weds lived in Vienna in a financially modest situation. Here, on March 3, 1879, their daughter Alice was born, and on the first of May in 1880, their son Herbert. Later in Prague, on the 14th of September in 1886, another son Jan entered the world, and on the 25th of May in 1891, their daughter Olga. The older son Herbert died at the early age of 35 on March 15, 1915. A positive financial turn for Masaryk did not come until 1884. A rich student, who died in Berlin, willed him his fortune. With that, the Masaryks were able to move into a villa according to his status and to pay off his debts in Vienna. Shortly thereafter, Charlotte's parents died, so they also received a large inheritance from that side of the family. (Continued on Human Rights Essays VI) How Masaryk Influenced Historic Events ========================================== |
